When comparing books
published for music education in 1906, 1920, 1995, and 2000 you find several
similarities, but mostly differences. The notation in the early books seems
unorganized by today’s standards. The book from 1906 uses enharmonic accidentals
in the same measure (bass part measure 1 with an A sharp and a B flat), which
is particularly interesting since the table of contents indicates the book's
strong focus on key structure. Both, the book from 1906 and the book from 1920,
lacked 8th note beaming, but instead used ties for like pitched
8th notes. It should be noted however, that the early music
books include breath marks while the later books did not. Additionally, the
book from 1906 was the only example that included dynamic markings. The later
books included chord symbols above the music and more intricate road maps (a
D.C. al Fine in 2000 example).
The nature of the songs
are fairly similar. In both eras there is a song addressing morals or values
(“A Lesson in Giving” 1906 and “Free At Last” 2000) and a song that simply
tells a story (“Little Miss Tulip” 1920 and “Don Gato” 1995). However, there
seems to be a wide variety in the overall curriculum plans. For example, the
early 20th century books are both divided into sections based
on musical theory; key signatures in 1906 and chords and intervals in 1920. On
the other hand, the books from 1995 and 2000 both use overarching themes. The
early books seem to focus strictly on singing while the later books branch out
to include instrumentation, professional musician spotlights, student
composition, and world musics.
The note range in the
early 1900s books is much larger than the range in the books from the late
1990s and early 2000s. I wonder if it was more acceptable to request a young
teenager to sing more over an octave in the early 1900s because of the American
lifestyle. We know in the early 1900s many American households had a piano in
their parlor and a main form of entertainment was to buy and play sheet music.
While children today still actively sing along with popular music on the radio,
I speculate that the vocal demand of popular music in the early 1900s was
greater than today’s top hits.
Year
|
Range
|
1906
|
Soprano: d to f, Alto: b to d,
Bass: g to g
|
1920
|
e to e
|
1995
|
d to c
|
2000
|
d to d
|
One very noticeable
difference between the books is the size. The 160 pages of the early textbooks
might have left some to be desired in terms of a well-rounded music textbook,
however the smaller size is less cumbersome for a 5th grade
student to hold compared to the 400 page monstrosities of the 2000s. During the
four years that I taught elementary music I never asked the kindergartners,
1st graders, or 2nd graders to get the books
off the shelf. The time it took them to bench press a book just to walk it to
their seat was incredible. I think most publishers are combating this by
creating digital resources of their book materials for teachers
with projectors.
No comments:
Post a Comment